The diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) mandate is deceptive. Most people see it as measures “innocently” supporting “different groups.”
Several prestigious American universities have pursued DEI as the latest trend. This effort is disastrous. As a result, some major firms now prefer not to hire their graduates.
DEI distorts judgments needed in the business world. Equity leads to imbalance and injustice. Meanwhile, inclusion becomes exclusionary when it silences those with dissenting views. Equity hurts diversity because everyone must think the same.
The woke DEI framework undermines core values by demanding people be treated not as individuals but as members of larger identity groups. It teaches people to value identity, not merit. Meritocracy, open debate and intellectual honesty suffer immensely from DEI.
DEI creates a childish institutional incompetence, whereby identity politics dictates decision-making processes rather than sound judgment and principle-based action.
Thus, schools like Harvard, Brown, Wharton, Dartmouth, Yale and Princeton are now hindering job acquisition. Many prospective employers have expressed disappointment with the woke attitudes and approaches students are using to deal with real-world problems, and they are rejecting these graduates.
Twenty-eight major corporations, for example, announced that they will not hire “radical” Ivy League students.
Eternal and Natural Law: The Foundation of Morals and Law
Meanwhile, Darren Woods, CEO of Exxon Mobil, said to CNBC, “If that action or those protests reflect the values of the campuses where they’re doing it, we wouldn’t be interested in recruiting students from those campuses.”
Similarly, Daniel Loeb, head of the $11 billion hedge fund Third Point, is reevaluating its recruitment strategy. Traditionally reliant on Ivy League schools like Harvard and Yale, Loeb now views these institutions as potentially too radical for nurturing balanced financial experts. “We are looking for high-quality candidates, but we’re going to be looking at different places” other than Ivy League schools, Loeb remarked.
Thirteen federal judges recently said they would not hire law clerks from Columbia Law School, citing its handling of campus protests as the reason. This clashes with the traditional view that elite education guarantees ultimate success. The judges’ letter underscores how the DEI-driven agendas in prestigious institutions undermine their educational mission and career opportunities.
Indeed, Ivy League schools are not producing the number of qualified applicants that investors, banks and corporations need, and they are looking for alternative areas to fulfill their needs. Many hires now come from relatively minor institutions that have not fostered liberal worldviews and immature emotional behavior. In a recent Forbes survey, 42 percent of employers indicated a higher likelihood of hiring from such colleges than from Ivy League schools.
According to The Chronicle of Higher Education, forty bills curbing DEI initiatives at public universities appeared in 22 states in 2023. This striking revelation underscored the increasing resistance to these programs at universities.
Ivy League universities are known for attracting the smartest, best and most motivated students to their programs. DEI is destroying these universities.
Learn All About the Prophecies of Our Lady of Good Success About Our Times
Even more disturbing is the faculty in these institutions that support the woke environment. These professors facilitate a dominant culture of toxic political correctness that makes their students unfit for the real world. Students are molded to be followers, not leaders, not the innovators and managers corporate America needs.
Yet another tragedy is the fact that many students who disagree with the prevailing “woke” culture emerge from their Ivy League experience traumatized.
The woke DEI framework challenges the core values of higher education by valuing identity politics over intellectual development. This shift in perspective is contrary to the purpose of the university as an institution that should seek wisdom, knowledge and truth.
Thus, DEI policies do not represent progress but a retreat. The proof lies in the business world’s rejection of Ivy League graduates. These schools must change course, lest an Ivy League diploma become a useless conversation piece on the family room wall.