Taking a Principled not a Personal Stand on Homosexuality, Homosexual “Marriage” and Transgenderism

Taking a Principled not a Personal Stand
Taking a Principled not a Personal Stand on Homosexuality, Homosexual “Marriage” and Transgenderism

In writing this statement, we have no intention to defame or disparage anyone. We are not moved by personal hatred against any individual. In intellectually opposing individuals or organizations promoting the homosexual and transgender agenda, our only intent is the defense of traditional marriage, the family, and the precious remnants of Christian civilization.

As practicing Catholics, we are filled with compassion and pray for those who struggle against unrelenting and violent temptation to homosexual sin or gender dysphoria. We pray for those who fall into homosexual sin out of human weakness, that God may assist them with His grace.

We are conscious of the enormous difference between these individuals who struggle with their weakness and strive to overcome it and others who transform their sin into a reason for pride and try to impose their lifestyle on society as a whole, in flagrant opposition to traditional Christian morality and natural law. However, we pray for these too.

We pray also for the judges, legislators and government officials who in one way or another take steps that favor homosexuality, same-sex “marriage,” and transgenderism. We do not judge their intentions, interior dispositions, or personal motivations.

Defending a Higher Law: Why We Must Resist Same Sex “Marriage” and the Homosexual Movement
FREE PDF Download, or
Order PRINT copy.

We reject and condemn any violence. We simply exercise our liberty as children of God (Rom. 8:21) and our constitutional rights to free speech and the candid, unapologetic and unashamed public display of our Catholic faith. We oppose arguments with arguments. To the arguments in favor of homosexuality, same-sex “marriage,” and transgenderism, we respond with arguments based on right reason, natural law and Divine Revelation.

In a polemical statement like this, it is possible that one or another formulation may be perceived as excessive or ironic. Such is not our intention.

*          *          *

FREE READ: Defending a Higher Law: Why We Must Resist Same Sex “Marriage” and the Homosexual Movement